SEO is Not a Dirty Word
82"Natural Writing"
Recently, HubPages staff have been warning Hubbers against writing for SEO. There's a lot of talk about the importance of "natural writing". I understand their motives, but frankly, that advice is just as dangerous in the other direction. Natural writing is rarely a good thing!
All professional writers craft their work. It's a very rare writer indeed who can put words on the page naturally, without any editing. For the vast majority, just putting words on the page will produce one of two things - over-long, rambling paragraphs or stark, colorless facts.
The very experienced writer carries all the "rules" in their head and may edit as they go along, so there's not much to do at the end - but we all need to edit, to ensure we give our readers the best possible experience.
The only difference with online writing is that we have a few more readers to consider - the search engines. And like it or not, they are VIP's! Because the hard fact is that if we don't please those 'readers', very few real people will ever see our beautifully crafted prose.
SEO - Search Engine Optimization - is just editing with the search engines in mind.
So Why Does HubPages Hate SEO?
It seems crazy that HubPages is so against SEO, when its purpose is to ensure our Hubs rank highly in the search engines, which results in higher earnings for us and for the company.
But I think I know where they're coming from.
HubPages wants good content, not spam. Spammers don't care about content - they focus on SEO and nothing else. They find their keywords, cobble them together with a few lame sentences - or worse, steal someone else's sentences - then use questionable tactics to get their drivel ranked high in the SERPs. HubPages can't do much about that kind of spammer, except ban them when they find them.
But there is another kind of unintentional spammer - the naive newbie. The newbie has read a few blogs or watched a few videos about how to write for the internet and they're too new to tell good advice from bad. As a result, they enthusiastically over-optimize - they over-use keywords, over-quote other articles, over-link, over-everything.
That kind of Hubber can cause just as much damage as a spammer, so HubPages wants to discourage them. Their solution seems to be to discourage everyone from "writing for SEO". But that, frankly, is throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Everything in Moderation
The truth is, if you want to gain readership beyond the HubPages community, you must understand and implement SEO. It's not evil, it's just another tool, like your spell checker. Like any tool, you need to learn how to use it, and use it sensibly.
A good writer will strike a balance between writing for the search engines and writing for their readers. That way, you get new visitors from Google, but you also get recommendations, "Likes" and "+1's" from real people who've enjoyed your Hub - all of which have real value and drive your Hub even higher in the ranks.
SEO is bad when it leads you to create clunky, repetitive writing. Once you're aware of it, it's easy to spot, especially if the writer has chosen a "long tail" keyword (which is actually a key phrase made up of several words).
For instance, say your long tail keyword is "pale blue gurning widgets". If you've learned a bit about SEO, you'll think you have to use that keyword at every opportunity, and you'll use the entire phrase every time you refer to them. Whereas if you're writing for readers, you wouldn't use the whole phrase every time - you'd be more concerned to avoid repetition, so you'd use "they", "these products", "widgets" etc., to add variety.
Headings and sub-headings are a common place where these errors occur. Over-eager writers will shoehorn the keywords in more than once - "Le Creuset Cast Iron Pots - the best cast iron pots". Writers with no awareness of SEO may not mention their keywords in headings at all!
Both are wrong when writing online. If you over-use the whole phrase, you'll get penalized for "keyword stuffing". If you avoid using the phrase, you may not use it often enough for Google to notice.
This is just one example of where a little knowledge of SEO can be a dangerous thing - but that doesn't mean SEO is bad. Far from it. Understand it properly and it's an indispensable tool that can make a huge difference to your success online.
vote upvote downshareprintflag
- Useful (12)
- Funny
- Awesome (2)
- Beautiful
- Interesting (5)
CommentsLoading...
Very good article on SEO.
I would like to believe that I write naturally, but make sure I use sub titles to divide paragraphs and etc...
SEO can be very stressful...Especially when you get a high off ton of views, only to see traffic fall from it's peak, and wonder why..
There are just so many variables...
I totally agree with you, and this kind of attitude irks me to no end.
I've seen people saying that keyword research is evil and the source of all Panda sickness in the world, as it's used for SEO. Right, because it's much better to just write using words that only you and your close friends use. Writing using words that people search for means you'll be able to be found. Making a point of writing with unusual words just so nobody can accuse you of writing for SEO is just plain dumb. If you are writing about shoes, because people search for shoes, use the word shoe instead of 'feet wrappings' and we'll all be grateful.
There. Rant over. Time to vote up :)
Interesting hub, Marissa, and not to brag but I'm one of those writers who don't need to edit (very little), but I still am not sure how great my hubs are...
:-)
Great topic for a hub! And your title made me laugh. I do freelance writing outside of HubPages, and I get frustrated when articles require a large number of clunky keywords strictly for SEO. I do keyword research for HubPages, but I try to avoid clunky long tail keywords. I'm glad that HubPages is trying to keep their site full of meaningful content and free of spam even if they do come off as anti-SEO sometimes.
About clunky long tail key words, correct me if I'm wrong, but if I search for "pale blue gurning widgets," the top search results will have all those words in their little snippet, but not necessarily in that order. I have always figured that natural writing with SEO in mind, as opposed to key word stuffing, would have me consider how many ways I could use those four words in different sentences within the same paragraph.
On the other hand, I wrote (and spun) an article about shower heads for Ezine and similar directories. Some of them told me that I had overused "shower heads." So I duly replaced some "shower heads" with pronouns or "these products" or something until I figured that pruning any more would no longer read naturally at all. Their software still complained. So I added some sentences that simply padded the article without adding any new information. I hear you about how we are not necessarily our own best editors, but frankly, I thought my original submission read more naturally than what the directories eventually accepted.
Oh well. Live and learn. I certainly try to combine good, natural writing with good SEO. My income does not give me very firm confidence that I have succeeded. So I really do want to know what you think of what I said in the first paragraph.
Great Hub, Marisa. I was not aware that HubPages 'hated' SEO but I believe it was slated by Google in the Panda purge for allowing too much low-quality writing. And, frankly, some Hubs really are very poorly written, so anything that improves our writing standards has to be a good thing.
I agree with other Hubbers that we have to aim for a good balance between what humans like to read and what robots like to fit in to their algorithms. There is also the concept of LSI (Latent Semantic Index), which laces the content with words that Google might expect to see in a well-written article by a human being. Not sure if I described that properly, but I find it helps not only my Google PRs but also helps make my content flow much better. So a case of robot Google helping us humans for once!
Great hub. The thing about SEO is that it doesn't need to look SEO'd. Things like good, descriptive titles and breaking text up into subtitles, and appropriate descriptions on pictures, and appropriate tagging, are all things that help boost your SEO as well as help your reader enjoy the article more. It's only a small percentage of people who overdo it.
And let's face it - most spammers don't SEO very well. They just keyword stuff.
Great article...thanks . SEO just for SEO's sake and not concentrating on the article and it's readers makes for some pretty boring reading so i can see what hubpages are trying to do.
On the other hand as you say, great targetted content can make for very interesting reading and should be encouraged.
SEO is a tough thing I think. It should have it's own target and the content should always be fresh. However, so many people are desperate nowadays. There are bad SEO which do spamming. On the other hand, there are still which are good.
Thank you for putting it into the right prospective.
Well, HubPages and I, personally, are not anti-SEO. We are against trying to engineer a piece of content instead of focusing on making sure it is high-quality. They're not mutually exclusive, but when you focus so much on the former at the expense of the latter, you're putting yourself at a long-term disadvantage.
We have always strongly suggested focusing on getting the title right. Focusing on keywords in the body of a Hub is really, really not necessary unless you are prone to wandering off topic. Google is "smart" enough to know if your article is really on the topic that your title suggests, and there is far more danger of getting penalized for trying to "rig" a Hub by putting in more keywords than by not having enough. I've seen it again and again and again.
When I mentioned this in the forum, it was in response to your suggestion that someone might not be using keywords often enough:
http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/79215?page=74#post
Opinions might vary, but we are not anti-SEO; we just think an SEO-friendly sensibility should be focused on a good title.
As a 'newbie' I have had quite a bit to learn about SEO. My personal conclusion is that I'd rather focus on quality, at least for now, until I get an adsense account. Thanks for this article. It helped me learn a little something extra about SEO.
I've read that post I linked to very carefully. Maybe you should reread it, and your reply to my response.
I'm with you, Marisa. SEO is vitally important to every Hubber; but it must be property applied, as you have indicated. Google's Panda updates, which I wrote a Hub about, are concerned with quality of writing. High quality writing is SEO at its fullest potential. Voted up!
Being able to write with SEO is a skill all it's own, something I'm still learning. Voting this Up and Interesting.






















K9keystrokes Level 7 Commenter 8 months ago
Great information Marisa. Finding a fine balance for useful vs poor performing SEO, is truly an art. One of which I am trying to learn more about every day. Thank you for sharing your wealth of knowledge. I value your insight highly.
Cheers~
K9